Friday, November 19, 2010

Why RootsTech?

During the past few months, I have had the privilege of working with some of the finest individuals on the planet. These are quality people who have been innovators, self-starters, and have executed with precision under some of the most strenuous timelines imaginable. I have also had the privilege of experiencing the excitement of many technology users and technology creators as they prepare for this new and exciting event.

From the moment I started working on RootsTech in July of 2010, I made it very clear that I needed a successor for 2012. I wanted this to feel like a community effort, and not as a conference owned by a single individual. I also knew that RootsTech 2011 would set the stage for an even more amazing conference in 2012. I would never recommend putting on a conference in eight months, let alone completely design a new conference as well in that time frame. Nevertheless, I thrive on a challenge, and felt it was an excellent opportunity that would finally help me accomplish what I have been trying to do since I came to FamilySearch: Create unity.

On many occasions I have been encouraged and urged to continue to chair RootsTech. While I appreciate the many wonderful compliments, my convictions about chairing only for 2011 have not changed. RootsTech is about community. I am a member of that community, both as a student of Computer Science, and a certified and accredited genealogist. I hope to participate in future years as a community member. It's your conference, my conference, our conference.

For nearly the past four years I have worked as a community manager. I have always felt that it was my role to serve the technological and genealogical communities by helping them come together. In line with that belief, I agreed to help breathe life into RootsTech, and then step into the community of those who ultimately own RootsTech. It is my hope that both technology users and technology creators will feel ownership of this conference.

I am so grateful for the opportunity to be a part of this great event. It will be an experience that I will never forget. I cannot claim credit for the success of RootsTech. The success belongs to the outstanding band of committee chairs and members who worked so hard to pull this off. The success belongs to the hundreds of volunteers who offered their time and talents to help support this event. The success belongs to the speakers who prepared and presented over a hundred innovative and collaborative classes. And finally, the success belongs to each and every one of you who chose to participate in RootsTech 2011.

While RootsTech 2011 won’t go down in history as the most perfectly planned and executed conference, I believe that it will go forward as the conference that helped build the future of family history and genealogy into something magnificent.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

15 Million New Indexed Records!

A Lot to Be Thankful For: 15 Million New Indexed Genealogical Records

Digital images and indexes include 34 collections from 13 countries

The collection of indexes and images available on FamilySearch’s beta website continues to grow by leaps and bounds, with the addition of 34 collections of genealogical records. These records include 15 million indexed records and 2.5 million images. The bounty of information covers 13 different countries around the world: Mexico, Chile, Colombia, Honduras, Guatemala, Brazil, France, Spain, Germany, Belgium, Jamaica, Canada, and the United States. Search these records now at Beta.FamilySearch.org.

See the chart below for the complete list of newly added or updated collections.

Project

Digital Images

Indexed Records

Comments

Belgium Marriages, 1563-1890

0

58,674

Index only.

Belgium, Antwerp Police Immigration Index, 1840-1930

5,417

343,930

New records and images. This is an index of immigration dossiers compiled by the Antwerp police force between 1840 and 1930. Presently, the immigration dossiers are only available on microfilm, so this publication allows us to reference these dossiers.

Brazil, Church Records, 1814-1930

93,787

0

New images for Ribeirao Preto, Bauru, Rio Preto, Santo Andre, Novo Hamburgo, Passo Fundo

Canada, Ontario Births, 1869-1912

54,121

164,139

New images and records

Chile, Concepcion, Civil Registration, 1885-1903

19,389

70,450

New images and records

Colombia, Diocese of CĂșcuta Parish Registers,1762-1996

465,172

0

New images added to existing collection

France Births and Baptisms, 1546-1896

0

6,779,071

Index only

Germany, Bremen Passenger Departure Lists, 1904-1914

44,465

44,315

New images and records

Guatemala, Guatemala City, Sagrario Parish Baptisms, 1898-1920

7,748

0

New images added to existing collection

Honduras, Tegucigalpa – Baptisms, 1895-1931

3,790

26,521

New images and records

Jamaica, Church of England Parish Register Transcripts, 1664-1880

37,199

0

New images added to existing collection

Jamaica, Civil Births 1878-1899

247,593

260,500

New images and records

Mexico Census, 1930

2,302

1,165,649

New images and records added to existing collection (Michoacan, Nuevo Leon, Zacatecas)

Spain, Avila–Catholic Church Records, 1500-1930

26,298

0

New images added to existing collection

Spain, Catastro de Ensenada, 1749-1756

375,988

0

New images added to existing collection

U.S., Arizona, Service Records of Confederate Soldiers of the Civil War, 1861-1863

0

1,173

Index only. Data courtesy of Footnote.com

U.S., Arkansas County Marriages, 1837-1957

0

94,181

New records added to existing collection

U.S., Georgia –Death Records, 1928-1930

123,416

0

New images added to existing collection

U.S., Index to Naturalizations of World War I Soldiers, 1918

0

18,324

Index only. Data courtesy of Footnote.com

U.S., Louisiana, Eastern District Naturalization Petitions, 1838-1861

0

1,450

Index only. Data courtesy of Footnote.com

U.S., Maryland, Naturalization Indexes, 1797-1951

0

85,222

Index only. Data courtesy of Footnote.com

U.S., Maryland, Naturalization Petitions, 1906-1931

0

45,165

Index only. Data courtesy of Footnote.com

U.S., Massachusetts Naturalization Index, 1906-1966

0

388,086

Index only. Data courtesy of Footnote.com

U.S., Minnesota, State Census, 1865

3,396

246,591

New images and records

U.S., Mormon Battalion Pension Applications, 1846-1923

0

26,830

Index only. Data courtesy of Footnote.com

U.S., New York State Census, 1905

0

3,601,920

New records for the following counties: Albany, Bronx, Broome, Columbia, Essex, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Madison, New York, Onondaga, Oswego, Seneca, Warren and Yates. This release completes this collection.

U.S., New York, Eastern District Naturalization Petitions, 1865-1957

0

675,035

Index only. Data courtesy of Footnote.com

U.S., New York, Western District, Naturalization Index, 1907-1966

0

89,554

Index only. Data courtesy of Footnote.com

U.S., Oklahoma, Applications for Enrollment of the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes, 1898-1914

0

882,272

Index only. Data courtesy of Footnote.com

U.S., Rhode Island, State Census, 1885

10,844

321,999

New images and records

U.S., Rhode Island, State Census, 1905

954,549

474,152

New images and records. This census was taken on a two-sided form where only one person appears on each form.

U.S., South Dakota State Census, 1945

0

546,305

New records added to existing collection

U.S., Tennessee County Marriages, 1790-1950

0

14,098

New records added to existing collection

U.S., Utah, Territorial Case Files of the U.S., District Courts, 1870-1896

0

39,040

Data courtesy of Footnote.com



Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Virtual Storage: Is Your Back-up Safe and Secure?

It amazes me how easily virtual storage is misunderstood. There are those who believe that just because something is saved in a virtual environment, it is safe and secure. About a year and a half ago I decided to investigate just how accurate this belief is. I presented the results of my research at a technology conference. The slides and paper are available online.

Since publishing this paper, I am sure there are many more virtual storage options are available. Even as I was doing the research and attempting to be complete in my analysis, I noticed more companies pop up. Understanding the various layers involved in virtual storage could impact the security and longevity of that data. For those not interested in reviewing the complete paper, here are a few critical questions to ask when seeking out a virtual storage provider:

1. Who owns the facility in which the data is stored?

2. Who owns the land on which the facility is built?

3. Who manages the security of the facility?

4. Who makes sure that the power, air conditioning, and air quality is maintained in the facility?

5. Is there a back-up power system in case power should go down? What is it? If it's fuel-based, is there a reserve of fuel available nearby to help keep the power on (and the data online)?

6. Is there a back-up system for the air conditioner? If the cooling system fails and the power keeps running, the servers could burn up, damaging data.

7. Is there location redundancy, meaning that a copy of the data is stored someplace far enough away that your data will still be available in case of a natural disaster where the original data is stored?

8. Is the equipment on which your data is stored up to date, or is it built on equipment whose vendor has gone out of business? If additional servers need to be added or replaced, will they work with the old servers without taking your data offline to do so?

9. Who owns the equipment on which the data is stored?

10. What happens to your data if the company who is leasing the servers goes out of business?

These are just a few of the many critical questions one must ask to understand how secure online storage systems really are, but there are many more. Many companies do not own the land, the facilities, or the equipment on which your data is stored. Many do not monitor the servers, but are instead a retail company that rents space on another company's servers.

While virtual storage has many important strengths, remember to choose a company with a good reputation. Companies that have detailed information about the facility and equipment on which the data is stored are generally more reliable. The less a company understands about how and where your data is stored, the more vulnerable your data could be. This not only applies to online storage systems, but any company that stores data that belongs to you.